Skip to main content

Conflicts 😖

I hate them
You hate them
but its good to know how to resolve them.

note

Please always use some tools (like VSCode, jetBrains's IDEs) to resolve git conflicts. It is much easier to resolve them seeing them visually.

I will show manually so that you can understand the tools.

Conflict arises when two different change occurs in the same place in git repo.

🤔Problem

Create a conflict with remote-git and local-git. To do this, please create a commit in both local-git and remote-git editing the same location within a file.

To accomplish this

  1. Use master in both repos
  2. change remote-git README.md first line to A + 1 and commit
  3. change local-git README.md first line to A + 2 and commit
  4. pull remote-git into local-git to create the conflict

You can resolve conflicts by choosing any combination of change.

note

if you resolved a conflict by taking your local changes, and if you do git status there will be nothing, as we have taken our own changes, but is nothing changed, but we still have to perform an empty merge commit.

note

After the conflict has been resolved git will make a new commit for resolving conflict because it is also a change to git repo state.

And with this if you don't push your changes to remote, and someone change remote again, then you will have perform each time an extra merge commit.

info

conflicts can also occur when you are trying to merge data from 1 branch to another, and they will also be resolved similarly.

Conflicts with rebase​

Remember rebase is fundamentally different from merge. rebase actually move our changes to the tip of the branch.

🤔Problem

Lets create another conflict but resolve it while using rebase instead of merge.

Steps:

  1. create change in remote-git and in README.md change A + 1 -> A + 3.
  2. create another change in bar.md LAST LINE in remote-git
  3. create change in local-git and in README.md change A + 1 -> A + 4.
  4. create another change in bar.md FIRST LINE in local-git
  5. rebase local-git's master with remote-git's and create the conflict

When we do this, eventually we will hit on a conflict like this:

> remote: Enumerating objects: 7, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (7/7), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
remote: Total 4 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Unpacking objects: 100% (4/4), 337 bytes | 21.00 KiB/s, done.
From ..\remote-git\
 * branch            master     -> FETCH_HEAD
   348223b..9cf1a20  master     -> origin/master
Auto-merging README.md
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in README.md
Auto-merging bar.md
error: could not apply 1dccd35... A+4
hint: Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with
hint: "git add/rm <conflicted_files>", then run "git rebase --continue".
hint: You can instead skip this commit: run "git rebase --skip".
hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git rebase", run "git rebase --abort".
Could not apply 1dccd35... A+4

see here only conflict occurs in README.md while rebase succeeded for bar.md.

note

  1. We can abort our rebase with git rebase --abort to get back to the state before, much like git merge --abort.

  2. You can instead skip this commit, run git rebase --skip, while performing rebase.

  3. After we resolved all the conflicts, we can perform git rebase --continue.

Now lets resolve the conflict.

We will choose remote-git changes that means A+3 will remain after resolving conflict.

🤕Footgun

Sometime we are in a habit to commit after a resolving a conflict, but in this case we are still performing rebase, which is playing our commits one at time. In such case you can do

git reset --soft HEAD~1

and then continue with

git rebase --continue

So why we did all this, lets check git log on local

git log --graph --oneline

See we do not have merge commit, with diverging branches. This is the beauty of rebase we can keep our history straight / clean, because it is easier to debug when something bad happens.

Problem with rebase​

We loose change while performing rebase. like in above there is nowhere that A+4 change exist in our history. (😏 except in reflog)

So this is some of the dangers of rebase. Basically we replayed our commits one by one in such a way that we removed ours / theirs changes from them.

🤔Problem

Lets try create the same issue except this time lets accept local-git change.

  1. A + 5 in remote-git.
  2. A + 6 in local-git.
  3. git pull origin trunk --rebase in local-git to cause the conflict.
  4. accept A + 6 change and git rebase --continue.
  5. check out history to see A + 6 commit.
  6. Don't Push the changes.
🤔Problem

Create a change in remote-git and pull again.

  1. Add a NewLine below A + 6 in remote-git and commit.
  2. rebase pull remote-git and cause the conflict
  3. DO NOT RESOLVE THE CONFLICT
  4. See the conflict
note

Rebase works by replaying the commits one at a time. Therefore if we have our change from a conflict and then we replay the changes, we will have reconflicts on the same change again and again.

Does that mean rebase sucks? Well no, it keeps your history very clean, but does that mean rebase can be annoying? Yes.

info

To solve this issue we have rerere

rerere stands for REuse REcorded REsolution. Or in other words, git will automagically remember how you handled a specific conflict and will just replay your decision the next time you run into it.

to enable this we have to do

git config rerere.enabled true

Good reason to use rebase with SQUASHME​

We can do a lot with rebase but I have only done rebase to squash my multiple commits into one.

You can

  • drop commits while rebasing
  • change commits messages
  • ...
🤔Problem

setup your local-git with 3 simple git commits.

  1. add 1 to end of read me. commit -m "added 1 ate"
  2. add 2 to end of read me. commit -m "added 2 ate"
  3. add 3 to end of read me. commit -m "added 3 ate"

Now we will use Interactive mode of rebasing and try to squash this merges into 1.


git rebase -i <commitish_value>

because of interactive mode, we get to choose how to replay our commits.

By this we can do anything with our commits.